| AGRICULTURE
Support Ontario Agriculture
(Submitted by the Prince Edward County Chamber of Tourism &
Commerce, & the Greater Dufferin Area Chamber of Commerce, with
support from the Belleville & District Chamber of Commerce &
Quinte |
FINANCE &
TAXATION
Changing the Way Business Regulations
are Developed
(Submitted by the Prince Edward County Chamber of Tourism
& Commerce with support from the Belleville & District,
and Quinte West Chambers of Commerce) |
Issue:
Agriculture in Canada is facing serious income shortfalls, with
negative net incomes in 2005 for the first time in history. Agriculture
is a high-risk business. Notwithstanding that good management is
a prerequisite for success, a majority of the factors determining
receipts and input costs are beyond a farmer's control. Variables
such as unpredictable weather conditions, fluctuations in market
prices, and government support to competing farmers in other countries
are a few examples. These factors severely undermine the ability
of Canadian farmers to compete effectively. A priority must be to
provide Canadian agriculture with the tools to create a stable and
healthy agriculture environment. In order for farmers to continue
investing and expanding their farming operations, they need financial
stability and adequate tools to offset the risks tied to agriculture.
The economy of Ontario is rapidly losing one of its major contributors,
that being the agricultural industry. The overall outlook for future
growth and development is at its lowest level and the average age
of today’s agricultural worker is in the mid fifties. Many
of these individuals are seeking ways and means of either retiring
or moving on into some other line of work.
Both levels of Government must be committed to strategic investment
in agriculture, investment that reflects immediate need in the agricultural
industry, as well as addressing long-term need to further the industry's
ongoing goals and objectives.
Background:
A healthy agricultural economy means an overall healthy economy
for Ontario. In the Canadian Senate’s interim report called
‘Understanding Freefall: The Challenge of the Rural Poor’,
the rural poor have rarely been the subject of political attention.
It is time for that situation to change since poverty in rural Ontario
spills over into urban areas and weakens the overall economy of
the province. This reality is manifested in the fact that the migration
of youth and business from rural Ontario to our urban centres creates
expensive consequences, ones that most small rural communities are
unable to deal with. As examples, we consider the infrastructure,
transportation and social problems we witness in the news every
day. In its 2006 report, the Organization for Economic Co-operation
and Development (OECD) provides additional supporting evidence such
as the “vicious cycle of a poor agricultural economy leading
to rural migration which leads to low population density, lack of
critical mass for infrastructure and services, low or declining
rates of business creation and fewer jobs”. These outcomes
weaken the remaining farm operations and the cycle continues with
little in the way of hope for improvement. Ontario farmers have
readily adopted technological advances – something that has
put agriculture at the forefront of productivity compared to other
industries. In making this point we wish to encourage increased
investment in agricultural research because in reality, the province
has reduced public investment in agricultural research by 30 per
cent in the past 10 years. The province needs to return investment
in agricultural research to an earlier level of $90 million per
year.
We agree that Ontario’s future prosperity depends largely
on its ability to continue to adapt, innovate and strengthen its
competitive advantage.
Primary agriculture is an essential integral component of Provincial
rural economics in particular and of Provincial urban economies
in general.
Provincial primary agricultural producers are the foundation for
sustainable communities across the Province.
Canada, which was once considered “the breadbasket of the
world’ is now in actual risk of losing our secure domestic
food supply and becoming dependent upon imported foods.
Canadian farmers have experienced an unprecedented financial crisis
which jeopardizes the future of family farms and the greater related
agricultural industry throughout the country.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Ontario Chamber of Commerce will urge the Government of Ontario
to:
1.
Recognize that the Ontario Government is the best organization to
distribute accordingly Federal & Provincial dollars in consultation
with agricultural organizations such as the Ontario Federation of
Agriculture and commodity organizations.
2.
Make ‘strategic investments to strengthen Ontario’s
economic advantage.’ Many of these investments need to be
made in agriculture and the province’s rural economic development
initiatives.
3.
Encourage increased investment in agricultural research because
in reality, the province has reduced public investment in agricultural
research. The 99
province needs to return investment in agricultural research to
an earlier level of $90 million per year.
4.
Examine investment in viable risk management and income support
programs based on the model developed by the industry; provide an
immediate down payment on long-term programs to provide assistance
for the millions of dollars lost by grains, oilseeds, horticultural
and livestock producers on their 2005 and 2006 sales; develop production
insurance products for livestock and horticultural crops; and develop
a federal and provincial program to buy out Ontario’s tobacco
growers.
5.
In cooperation with the federal government, correct service delivery
problems with Agricorp; update the compensation schedule for damage
done by wildlife to livestock, poultry, crops and farm infrastructure;
extend the Land Transfer Tax to include all family farms in farm
corporations and estate trusts; and improve energy pricing and production
situations related to farms.
6.
Recognize the diversity of Ontario agriculture requires strategic
investments, preferably in the form of bankable, long-term programs,
but, if necessary, as an investment that strategically compliments
the federal initiative. |
Issue:
New regulations invoked by the Ontario Government that effect many
sectors of business are perceived by business owners as unduly heavy
in Ontario and place many businesses in jeopardy of survival. Presently
many regulations imposed by the Ontario Government are “precautionary”
focused as apposed to science based.
The “precautionary principle” allows
for implementation of regulation on the basis that a situation “may
be” present or “may be” harmful, without any true
science to back up the fear. This approach places an unnecessary
financial and fiscal burden on society to address problems that
may not even exist.
Background:
Some examples of recent regulations being implemented without proper
consultation and have huge financial implications are:
The Safe Water Drinking Act Regulation 170/03 was brought about
from the tragic incident occurring at Walkerton, a municipal water
treatment plant. This regulation affected every business and service
facility in Ontario that served the public and relied on its own
source of water.
The estimated capital cost of the regulation to business exceeded
one BILLION dollars. The then Minister of the Environment, Leona
Dombrowsky, stated that she recognized that the regulation was flawed;
that it was brought about with very little public consultation (especially
from rural Ontario); and that it had to be changed.
The province introduced Bill 43 (the Clean Water Act, 2005) to protect
existing and future sources of drinking water. Public information
sessions were planned, largely in major urban centres when the act
affects rural landowners, farms, small and medium businesses and
municipalities.
Concerns:
Without proper consultation with the business owners affected by
new regulations, many businesses will not be able to survive. In
rural Ontario where many of these regulations are imposed, many
businesses are closing resulting in loss of jobs and causing economic
hardship.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Ontario Chamber of Commerce urges the Government of Ontario
to:
1.
Impose a statutory requirement for broad based consultations for
at least 60 days with businesses / stakeholders to be affected by
a regulation prior to adoption.
2.
Focus its efforts to reduce regulatory burdens on all business and
ensure all regulations imposed are research based.
3.
Review proposed regulations on a cost/benefit basis (identify and
publicly disclose the actual cost of implementing, enforcing and
maintaining the regulation and then ensure those costs do not outweigh
the benefit garnered from the regulation).
4.
Before enacting the regulation identify which ministry will be responsible
for implementation and be able to answer all questions.
5.
Ensure that enactment of regulation does not place such financial
burden on any one sector and that the economics of the country are
not adverselyaffected.
|